Super 16 Rankings

RealTalksz wrote:You cant really say Campion, Vaughn or Pope were all missing players and they should be higher and then say Martingrove was missing Justin and they should be lower.. that makes no sence Justin is a better player then any of the players missing on all those teams.. Martingrove should be placed higher then Vaughn after Humber only because St. Mikes defeated Vaughn and Martingrove beating St. Mikes.. Also I agree with you though rerun when you say Campion is ranked to high.. They won the Humber tournament but no team in the previous Top 16 that tart11 had placed which was ranked 1-5 was in this tournament except for Vaughn who they beat by 4 and Pope who I think shouldnt have been ranked top 5 in your top 16.. I see Campion losing to Carr, Pickering, MT and Loyola Oakville by 5-10+ points easy..

tart11 wrote:Campion 69 Martingrove 57
Campion 56 Vaughan 52
St Mikes 60 Vaughan 53
Martingrove 59 St Mikes 57
Emery 80 Pope 66
Brampton Centennial 74 St Augustine 72 in OT
St Augustine 57 Brampton Centennial 45

rerun wrote:Wow! Some people have lost their minds. I know people have the right to their own opinions, but, you lose credibility when you put together a list of your personal favorites and disregard recent on court results. Martingrove is sixth on two personal polls when they lost to J Clarke Richardson by 5 at the Henry Carr Early Bird Tourney. J Clarke Richardson is ranked 14th and 15th...that's just funny....how did you arrive at that?